Letter: Lane removal has drawbacks
By Jeri Saylor, Vancouver Published: February 3, 2025, 6:00am
On Dec. 18, 2024, I was pleased to read that Clark County Auditor Greg Kimsey had certified the ballot initiative that would require voter approval to remove traffic lanes in Vancouver. On Jan. 8, I laughed when I read the “Build cities for people, not cars” signs shown on the front page of The Columbian. People drive cars to get to work or school, buy or deliver groceries and other commodities, go to doctor’s offices and restaurants, deliver their voter ballots, etc. This initiative wouldn’t exist had the city council members thought about all their taxpayers. Is the city biased against the elderly, the disabled, or people who just can’t ride buses or bicycles to get to their destinations? Using Fourth Plain Boulevard now takes me twice as long to get to work, using more gas. So I can’t patronize restaurants at lunch, or other businesses on this corridor. Sadly, businesses may close due to loss of revenue. The people who navigate vehicles, buses and bicycles are so distracted by reading the continuously changing lane and sign instructions down this challenging corridor that it’s dangerous. Hopefully, this doesn’t cause more accidents and fatalities.
We have provided this article, free from trackers, paywalls, or other monetization. It is entirely provided as a service for the convenience of the community of Vancouver, Washington. We encourage you to read the article in its original format at the following url https://www.columbian.com/news/2025/feb/03/letter-lane-removal-has-drawbacks/, which is the website of the original publisher.
We are in no way affiliated with The Columbian and are not responsible for the content which they have published. To have this article removed from our website, please contact our Cease and Desist Department.
This article originated from
The Columbian
on 2025-02-03 14:06:01.
Visit their website and subscribe today!